There is growing evidence
indicating that the use of psychometric tests for selection purposes
has increased in recent years. All types of organizations are using tests
and are using more of them. The results of a survey conducted in 2004
across a wide range of organizations are shown below.
|
Main Reason |
Additional Reason |
To predict candidates performance |
41% |
73% |
To assess whether candidate will fit-in |
34% |
67% |
To obtain information prior to interview |
25% |
48% |
There are several reasons for the increase in the number
of organizations using tests:
Increased Regulation and Legislation
Increased test use can be seen as a defensive strategy, adopted in response
to regulation and legislation. The single most frequently given reason
for increases in testing was the need to have a selection process which
would withstand legal challenges. Tests offer two advantages in this
situation. They can be seen to be objective measures of how a candidate’s
skills align with the ‘competency profile’ for the job in question.
These competency profiles are themselves seen as promoting access and
equality of opportunity as well as reflecting the organizations skill
requirements. Most if not all of the widely used tests have been proven
not have adverse impact on minority groups, and are therefore fully
compatible with equal opportunity policies.
Test Results Are More Useful Now Than Previously
It is important to understand that the tests themselves have not changed
very much over the past few years. In fact, some widely used personality
questionnaires have been in use for over 30 years. However, the political
and cultural environment in which organizations operate has changed
significantly. The difficulty of dismissing staff means that decisions
to hire are seen as increasingly high risk, and the placing of low-paid
staff in customer facing jobs, or with health and safety responsibilities,
is treated with increasing seriousness. In addition, some organizations
have expressed concerns that using qualifications as a criterion for
selection may create barriers to access and be viewed as contravening
equal opportunity policies.
Increased Costs of Training Staff
Changes in the economy have raised the cost of training and
developing staff. It is a fact that organizations with larger training
expenditures use psychometric testing more than those with smaller
training expenditure. This may be because the cost of staff development
increases the value of all relevant selection information, and in particular
justifies the additional cost of testing.
Testing Costs Have Decreased
Increased test use is a response to the decreasing cost of testing relative
to other methods of selection. In the past few years the cost of ‘buying
in’ to psychometric testing has fallen. This is due to more providers
entering the market and to the increased use of technology, particularly
the internet, in administering tests and assessing the results. Computer-based
tests provide more or less instantaneous scoring and feedback which
reduces the need to have sufficient trained assessors available for
results to be fed back into the selection process quickly enough to
be useful.
The Result of More Formal HR Policies
The increase in employment related litigation has encouraged many organizations
to recruit more highly qualified human resources personnel. Who, for
reasons of professional conviction and departmental self-interest,
tend to promote more formalized methods of selection. In addition,
HR professionals are familiar with psychometric tests and tend to believe
in their value which further encourages the use of testing. Psychometric
testing also offers some ‘scientific’ credibility and objectivity to
the recruitment process which otherwise can be seen as highly subjective.
Tests also give the interviewer an indication of areas to discuss in
detail at the interview. This can make for more interesting and productive
discussions within interviews concentrating on areas which have been
identified.
Loss of confidence in Academic Qualifications
There is strong evidence for of a loss of confidence in school-based
formal qualifications and/or the standard of degrees. This is particularly
true among senior managers in organizations and has been widely reported
in the press over the past ten years or so. Many managers now accept
tests as providing up-to-date information on skills such as quantitative
reasoning which complement qualification-based evidence. Tests are
also seen as providing data on a variety of skills which are not suited
to formal certification.
Screening Large Numbers of Candidates
Psychometric tests are used so extensively by large organizations because
they are a quick and relatively cheap way of eliminating large numbers
of unsuitable candidates in very early in the recruitment process.
Screening out these candidates as soon as possible, means that the
organization can then concentrate more time and effort on the remainder.
From the perspective of human resources, psychometric testing can reduce
the workload considerably as it can replace initial screening interviews
which were traditionally used to shortlist candidates for a more rigorous
second interview.
The Future of Psychometric Testing
All of the above factors are likely to encourage further growth in psychometric
testing in the immediate future. No further changes in the external
environment are needed for this to happen: simply the continuing influence
of HR departments in a highly regulated labor market coupled with
an increasing number of managers who are comfortable with tests.
One point of interest is that there remains
a significant difference in test usage between large and small organizations.
This was shown clearly by the results of the
Workplace Employee Relations Study (1998) but it is likely that the decreasing
costs associated with administering psychometric tests will see this
difference eroded.
|
10+ Employees |
100+ Employees |
Personality Questionnaires |
19.4% |
47.9% |
Aptitude/Ability Tests |
39.2% |
63.2% |
All of the surveys of psychometric testing produced over
the past 5 years are consistent in indicating that use has been growing
steadily and that test use for recruitment is now very common and supports
a substantial commercial sector of test creation and processing. This
has led directly to more and more specific tests being produced for use
within particular organizations or for particular jobs. As more of these
tests gain recognition and acceptance it is inevitable that psychometric
testing will continue to increase. What
You Can Expect on the Day > |