|
There is growing evidence indicating that the use of psychometric
tests for selection purposes has increased in recent years. All
types of organizations are using tests and are using more of them.
The results of a survey conducted in 2009 across a wide range of
organizations are shown below.
| |
Main Reason |
Additional Reason |
|
To predict candidates performance |
41% |
73% |
|
To assess whether candidate will fit-in |
34% |
67% |
|
To obtain information prior to interview |
25% |
48% |
There are several reasons for the increase in the number of
organizations using tests:
Increased Regulation and Legislation
Increased test use can be seen as a defensive strategy, adopted in
response to regulation and legislation. The single most frequently
given reason for increases in testing was the need to have a
selection process which would withstand legal challenges. Tests
offer two advantages in this situation. They can be seen to be
objective measures of how a candidate’s skills align with the
‘competency profile’ for the job in question. These competency
profiles are themselves seen as promoting access and equality of
opportunity as well as reflecting the organizations skill
requirements. Most if not all of the widely used tests have been
proven not have adverse impact on minority groups, and are
therefore fully compatible with equal opportunity policies.
Test Results Are More Useful Now Than Previously
It is important to understand that the tests themselves have not
changed very much over the past few years. In fact, some widely
used personality tests have been in use for over 30
years. However, the political and cultural environment in which
organizations operate has changed significantly. The difficulty of
dismissing staff means that decisions to hire are seen as
increasingly high risk, and the placing of low-paid staff in
customer facing jobs, or with health and safety responsibilities,
is treated with increasing seriousness. In addition, some
organizations have expressed concerns that using qualifications as
a criterion for selection may create barriers to access and be
viewed as contravening equal opportunity policies.
Increased Costs of Training Staff
Changes in the economy have raised the cost of training and
developing staff. It is a fact that organizations with larger
training expenditures use psychometric testing more than those
with smaller training expenditure. This may be because the cost of
staff development increases the value of all relevant selection
information, and in particular justifies the additional cost of
testing.
Testing Costs Have Decreased
Increased test use is a response to the decreasing cost of testing
relative to other methods of selection. In the past few years the
cost of ‘buying in’ to psychometric testing has fallen. This is
due to more providers entering the market and to the increased use
of technology, particularly the internet, in administering tests
and assessing the results. Computer-based tests provide more or
less instantaneous scoring and feedback which reduces the need to
have sufficient trained assessors available for results to be fed
back into the selection process quickly enough to be useful.
The Result of More Formal HR Policies
The increase in employment related litigation has encouraged many
organizations to recruit more highly qualified human resources
personnel. Who, for reasons of professional conviction and
departmental self-interest, tend to promote more formalized
methods of selection. In addition, HR professionals are familiar
with psychometric tests and tend to believe in their value which
further encourages the use of testing. Psychometric testing also
offers some ‘scientific’ credibility and objectivity to the
recruitment process which otherwise can be seen as highly
subjective. Tests also give the interviewer an indication of areas
to discuss in detail at the interview. This can make for more
interesting and productive discussions within interviews
concentrating on areas which have been identified.
Loss of confidence in Academic Qualifications
There is strong evidence for of a loss of confidence in
school-based formal qualifications and/or the standard of degrees.
This is particularly true among senior managers in organizations
and has been widely reported in the press over the past ten years
or so. Many managers now accept tests as providing up-to-date
information on skills such as quantitative reasoning which
complement qualification-based evidence. Aptitude tests are also seen as
providing data on a variety of skills which are not suited to
formal certification.
Screening Large Numbers of Candidates
Psychometric tests are used so extensively by large organizations
because they are a quick and relatively cheap way of eliminating
large numbers of unsuitable candidates in very early in the
recruitment process. Screening out these candidates as soon as
possible, means that the organization can then concentrate more
time and effort on the remainder. From the perspective of human
resources, psychometric testing can reduce the workload
considerably as it can replace initial screening interviews which
were traditionally used to shortlist candidates for a more
rigorous second interview.
The Future of Psychometric Testing
All of the above factors are likely to encourage further growth in
psychometric testing in the immediate future. No further changes
in the external environment are needed for this to happen: simply
the continuing influence of HR departments in a highly regulated
labor market coupled with an increasing number of managers who are
comfortable with tests.
One point of interest is that there remains a significant
difference in test usage between large and small organizations.
This was shown clearly by the results of the Workplace Employee
Relations Study (1998) but it is likely that the decreasing costs
associated with administering psychometric tests will see this
difference eroded.
| |
10+ Employees |
A100+ Employees |
|
Personality Questionnaires |
19.4% |
47.9% |
|
Aptitude/Ability Tests |
39.2% |
63.2% |
All of the surveys of psychometric testing produced over the
past 5 years are consistent in indicating that use has been
growing steadily and that test use for recruitment is now very
common and supports a substantial commercial sector of test
creation and processing. This has led directly to more and more
specific tests being produced for use within particular
organizations or for particular jobs. As more of these tests gain
recognition and acceptance it is inevitable that psychometric
testing will continue to increase.
What
You Can Expect on the Day >

Everything you need to pass
psychometric tests |